You’re sitting in class, and your
teacher says:
“Follow Accounting Standards.”
Then in the next lecture, someone
says:
“Companies now follow Ind AS.”
And you’re like…
“Sir, are these the same thing or different?”
This is exactly where most students
get confused.
In my teaching experience, I’ve seen
even good students mix up Accounting Standards (AS) and Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind AS) — not because the topic is hard, but because
nobody explains the real difference clearly.
Let’s fix that today, step by step —
like we would in a real classroom.
Simple
Understanding First (No Confusion Zone)
Let’s not jump into heavy
definitions.
👉 Think like this:
- Accounting Standards (AS) = Older rules (Indian GAAP-based)
- Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) = Modern rules (based on global standards like IFRS)
That’s it. That’s your base.
Now let’s make it clearer.
What
Are Accounting Standards (AS)?
Accounting Standards (AS) are rules
that guide how businesses should prepare financial statements — like Profit
& Loss Account, Balance Sheet, etc.
These were issued by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India.
👉 They were designed mainly
for Indian businesses, keeping Indian conditions in mind.
Simple
Example
A shopkeeper in Bhopal sells goods
worth ₹50,000 on credit.
Now question:
👉 When should he record this sale?
As per AS (especially AS 9 – Revenue
Recognition):
- Record when ownership is transferred, not when
cash is received.
So even if payment comes later, sale
is recorded now.
✔️
Simple, practical, and focused on basic accounting.
What
Are Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)?
Now comes the modern version.
Ind AS are accounting standards
aligned with global standards (IFRS).
They are issued by the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs, based on recommendations of ICAI.
👉 These are used by:
- Listed companies
- Large companies
- Companies with significant financial impact
Simple
Example
Same situation:
A company sells goods worth ₹50,000 on credit.
But under Ind AS (Ind AS 115 –
Revenue):
Now the company must check:
- Has control transferred?
- Are there performance obligations?
- Is revenue measurable reliably?
👉 More detailed, more
judgment-based.
Why
Two Different Standards Exist?
Good question. Ask yourself:
👉 Why not just keep one
system?
Because:
1.
Old System Was Simple but Limited
AS worked well for small and medium
businesses.
But as companies grew, global
investors needed:
- Transparency
- Comparability
- Uniformity across countries
2.
Global Integration Became Important
Imagine an Indian company raising
funds from the US.
If accounts are prepared using old
AS:
- Foreign investors may not understand them easily
Ind AS solves this by aligning with
global practices.
Visual
Analogy (Easy to Remember)
Think like this:
- AS = Local Road Rules
- Ind AS = International Driving Rules
If you drive within your city →
local rules are enough
If you travel globally → you need international standards
Same logic.
Real-Life
Examples (Indian Context)
Example
1: Small Retail Business
A kirana store in Bhopal:
- Annual turnover: ₹20 lakh
- Uses simple accounting
👉 Follows AS
Because:
- No need for complex reporting
- No investors involved
Example
2: Growing Company
A manufacturing company:
- Turnover: ₹150 crore
- Taking loans from banks
👉 May shift to Ind AS
Because:
- Banks want transparency
- Financial statements must be more detailed
Example
3: Listed Company
A company listed on stock exchange:
👉 Must follow Ind AS
Why?
- Investors from different countries
- Need global-level reporting
Step-by-Step
Difference (Clear Comparison Table)
|
Basis |
Accounting
Standards (AS) |
Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind AS) |
|
Nature |
Traditional |
Modern
& Global |
|
Based
On |
Indian
GAAP |
IFRS
(International) |
|
Complexity |
Simple |
More
complex |
|
Flexibility |
Less
judgment |
More
judgment required |
|
Users |
Small
& medium businesses |
Large
& listed companies |
|
Focus |
Legal
form |
Economic
substance |
|
Example |
Record
sale when ownership transfers |
Check
control + obligations |
|
Issued
By |
ICAI |
MCA
(with ICAI support) |
This
Is Where Most Students Get Confused…
Confusion
1:
“Ind AS is just updated AS”
❌ Wrong thinking
✔️ Right thinking:
Ind AS is not just an update
It is a completely different approach
Confusion
2:
“Both give same results”
Not always.
Let’s see:
Example
A company gives a product with
warranty.
- Under AS → Expense recognized simply
- Under Ind AS → Provision calculated using probability
& estimates
👉 Result:
Profit can be different under both systems.
In
My Teaching Experience…
I once asked a student:
“Why do we need Ind AS?”
He said:
👉 “Because AS is outdated.”
Partly correct, but incomplete.
Real answer:
👉 “Because businesses have become global.”
This is where understanding matters
more than memorization.
Why
This Matters in Real Life
If you are:
- A commerce student → You’ll face this in exams
- An accountant → You’ll apply this in job
- A business owner → It affects compliance
Real
Impact
Let’s say:
A company reports profit:
- Under AS → ₹10 lakh
- Under Ind AS → ₹8 lakh
👉 Investors may take
different decisions based on this
So yes — it’s not just theory.
Common
Mistakes Students Make
- Thinking AS and Ind AS are same
- Ignoring the “global” angle
- Memorizing definitions without logic
- Forgetting practical application
- Not understanding why Ind AS is complex
Wrong
vs Right Thinking
|
Wrong
Thinking |
Right
Thinking |
|
AS
is old, Ind AS is new |
Ind
AS is global-focused |
|
Both
are same |
Approach
is different |
|
Just
memorize |
Understand
logic |
|
Only
for exams |
Used
in real companies |
Practical
Impact (Business + Exams)
In
Exams:
- Questions may ask differences
- Case studies may involve revenue recognition
In
Business:
- Affects profit calculation
- Impacts investor decisions
- Important for compliance
Where
This Concept Is Used
You will see this topic in:
- Financial Reporting
- Corporate Accounting
- CA Foundation / Intermediate
- Company Accounts
Personal
Story (Real Classroom Moment)
I remember once explaining this
topic, and a student said:
“Sir, why make life complicated with
Ind AS?”
I smiled and said:
👉 “Because business itself
has become complicated.”
When companies operate globally,
accounting must also evolve.
That day, the confusion disappeared
— not because of definition, but because of logic.
Reflective
Questions (Think for Yourself)
- If India didn’t adopt Ind AS, how would foreign
investors trust Indian companies?
- Do you think small businesses should also follow Ind
AS?
Think about it — this is how clarity
builds.
Expert
Insight Layer
If you want to truly master this
topic:
👉 Don’t compare words
👉 Compare approach
- AS → Rule-based
- Ind AS → Principle-based
That’s the real difference.
Power
Line
👉 Accounting Standards
tell you WHAT to do, but Ind AS forces you to think WHY you are doing it.
Quick
Recap (Revision Friendly)
- AS = Old, simple, Indian-focused
- Ind AS = Modern, complex, global-focused
- AS is used by small businesses
- Ind AS is used by large & listed companies
- Main difference = Approach + complexity
Internal
Linking Opportunities (SEO Boost)
You can also explore:
- What is Accounting Standard?
- Difference Between GAAP and IFRS
- What is Financial Statement Analysis
FAQs
(Student-Focused)
1.
Are AS and Ind AS both used in India?
Yes. AS is used by smaller entities,
while Ind AS is mandatory for certain companies.
2.
Is Ind AS compulsory for all companies?
No. Only for specified companies
like listed or large companies.
3.
Which is more difficult – AS or Ind AS?
Ind AS is more complex because it
requires judgment and deeper understanding.
4.
Can results differ under AS and Ind AS?
Yes, profit and financial position
can differ due to different treatment.
5.
Why is Ind AS based on IFRS?
To make Indian companies globally
comparable.
6.
Should students focus more on Ind AS?
For higher studies and professional
courses, yes — but basics of AS are equally important.
7.
Is Ind AS used internationally?
Ind AS is India’s version of IFRS,
so it is aligned but not exactly the same.
Author
Bio
Hi, I’m Manoj Kumar.
I hold an MBA and have practical exposure to accounting, taxation, and business
concepts. Along with this, I’ve spent time guiding and explaining these
subjects to students in a way that actually makes sense to them.
In my experience, most students
don’t find commerce difficult — they just don’t get the right explanation.
That’s where I focus. I break down concepts into simple, logical steps so they
are easier to understand and remember.
Through Learn with Manika, I aim to
make commerce learning clear, practical, and useful — whether you’re preparing
for exams or trying to understand how things work in real life.
When I explain a concept, I always
focus on the logic behind it, because once that becomes clear, confidence
automatically follows.
Disclaimer
This article is for educational
purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.
